i agree with Tucker on this law suit. the guy interviewed used a very faulty defense of the suit.
he is admitting the law suit has no grounds to sue but are looking and hoping to find grounds in the trial.
in other words, there is no evidence of probable cause to believe the accusation nor possible cause to believe it other than the fact that the suers are of a certain religion.
this appears to be a case where a person is considered guilty until proven innocent.
whatever he is getting paid he isn't doing his job. lol his argument is full of holes big enough that you can a truck through. and thanks for the compliment.
7 comments:
i agree with Tucker on this law suit. the guy interviewed used a very faulty defense of the suit.
he is admitting the law suit has no grounds to sue but are looking and hoping to find grounds in the trial.
in other words, there is no evidence of probable cause to believe the accusation nor possible cause to believe it other than the fact that the suers are of a certain religion.
this appears to be a case where a person is considered guilty until proven innocent.
Griper,
I consider the case a dry run for our rights to be safe according to the guy interviewed!
How much money is in it for him I wonder!
whatever he is getting paid he isn't doing his job. lol his argument is full of holes big enough that you can a truck through. and thanks for the compliment.
Yep you got that right and you are so welcome Griper! :)
dcat! Let's roll, girl!
DC in 2008, Million Man March to take back our country!
http://thepugilstick.blogspot.com/2007/07/lets-roll.html
Spread the word!
Remember to state the the karon in the toilet is art!!!
Atheling2,
Yep and thanks girlfriend! I will get to your site when life doesn't have me so busy. UGH THE END OF JULY ALREADY!!!
Post a Comment